2008 Summary of Results

These tables include results submitted and fully processed through 2008/03/31.


USA 2008 Finishers by Region (year to date)

Region # of finishers
ACP events RM events RUSA events
2003004006001000flèches <200 2003004006001000darts arrows
Little Rock, AR               7              
Casa Grande, AZ 32 16                          
Desert Camp, AZ                 2            
Davis, CA 70                            
Los Angeles, CA 67 32                          
San Diego, CA 20 17 11         16              
San Francisco, CA 32 31                          
Santa Cruz, CA 31             4              
Santa Rosa, CA                 16            
Washington, DC                 58            
Central FL 31 27 21                        
Gainesville, FL 42 31 14                        
Atlanta, GA 34 18             22            
New Orleans, LA 12               1            
Kansas City, MO 3                            
Jackson, MS                 9            
High Point, NC 30 6                          
Portland, OR               84           3  
San Juan, PR 73 30                          
Spartanburg, SC 20                            
Nashville, TN 8 16                          
Austin, TX 14                            
Brownsville, TX 3 9           5              
Dallas, TX 52 30 36         29 14            
Houston, TX 34 17 16           4            
Seattle, WA 100             110           20  
TOTALS 708 280 98         255 126         23  


ACP Points

The ACP assigns "points" for each rider that completes an ACP-sanctioned event. The number of points assigned depends on the brevet distance as indicated by the table below. Nations and organizing clubs are ranked by the number of points accumulated during the year and the results are listed in the annual ACP plaquette (magazine). PBP completions accumulate ACP points; however, other 1200km+ events such as BMB do not. There are no ACP points for fleches nor are there any for domestically-sanctioned events such as populaires, arrows, and domestic brevets.

DistanceACP Points (per finisher)
200km2
300km3
400km4
600km6
1000km10
1200km (PBP only)12 (male finisher)
18 (female finisher)

USA 2008 ACP Points by Organizing Club (year to date)

Club Finishers ACP Points
2003004006001000
Lone Star Randonneurs/943026 52 30 36     338
San Juan Cycling Club/952001 73 30       236
Gainesville Cycling Club/909005 42 31 14     233
Los Angeles Wheelmen/905063 67 32       230
Central Florida Randonneurs/909062 31 27 21     227
Seattle International Randonneurs/947018 100         200
Houston Randonneurs/943030 34 17 16     183
San Francisco Randonneurs/905030 32 31       157
Davis Bike Club/905014 70         140
San Diego Randonneurs/905140 20 17 11     135
Audax Atlanta/910004 34 18       122
Southern Arizona Randonneurs/903020 32 16       112
Bicycle For Life Club/933057 30 6       78
Harpeth Bicycle Club/942046 8 16       64
Santa Cruz Randonneurs/905106 31         62
Freewheelers of Spartanburg/940046 20         40
TexSun Randonneurs/943048 3 9       33
Hill Country Randonneurs/943025 14         28
Crescent City Randonneurs/918002 12         24
Kansas City Ultra Cycling/925001 3         6
PAC Tour/949005           0
DC Randonneurs/946012           0
Magnolia State Randonneurs/924002           0
Central Arkansas Brevet Series/904003           0
Oregon Randonneurs/937020           0
Santa Rosa Cycling Club/905048           0
TOTALS 708 280 98     2648


Domestic Points

RUSA also has developed a system of points that includes all events on its calendar, some of which are not counted under the ACP points system. For example, a small region that organizes a 1200km event or a series of populaires may accumulate more domestic points than ACP points during a season. Domestic points recognize RBAs who are expanding the range of randonneur event types in their regions. The domestic points system may be used in various cost-sharing formulas or rebate systems intended to assist RBAs.

Type and DistanceDomestic Points (per finisher)
RUSA Populaire1
ACP or RUSA 200km2
ACP or RUSA 300km3
ACP or RUSA 400km4
ACP or RUSA 600km6
ACP or RUSA 1000km10
RM-sanctioned 1200km (e.g., BMB)12
ACP flèche or RUSA arrow4
RUSA dart2

USA 2008 RUSA Points by Region (year to date)

Region RUSA Points
Dallas, TX 395
Seattle, WA 350
San Juan, PR 236
Gainesville, FL 233
Los Angeles, CA 230
Central FL 227
Houston, TX 191
Atlanta, GA 166
San Francisco, CA 157
San Diego, CA 151
Davis, CA 140
Washington, DC 116
Casa Grande, AZ 112
Portland, OR 90
High Point, NC 78
Santa Cruz, CA 66
Nashville, TN 64
Spartanburg, SC 40
Brownsville, TX 38
Santa Rosa, CA 32
Austin, TX 28
New Orleans, LA 26
Jackson, MS 18
Little Rock, AR 7
Kansas City, MO 6
Desert Camp, AZ 4


Makeup of Participants (year to date)

Region # of finishers % RUSA
members
(see note A)
2003004006001000total ACP
brevets
Little Rock, AR             n/a
Casa Grande, AZ 32 16       48 65%
Desert Camp, AZ             n/a
Davis, CA 70         70 61%
Los Angeles, CA 67 32       99 72%
San Diego, CA 20 17 11     48 83%
San Francisco, CA 32 31       63 78%
Santa Cruz, CA 31         31 94%
Santa Rosa, CA             n/a
Washington, DC             n/a
Central FL 31 27 21     79 90%
Gainesville, FL 42 31 14     87 94%
Atlanta, GA 34 18       52 87%
New Orleans, LA 12         12 100%
Kansas City, MO 3         3 100%
Jackson, MS             n/a
High Point, NC 30 6       36 94%
Portland, OR             n/a
San Juan, PR 73 30       103 83%
Spartanburg, SC 20         20 75%
Nashville, TN 8 16       24 100%
Austin, TX 14         14 93%
Brownsville, TX 3 9       12 100%
Dallas, TX 52 30 36     118 100%
Houston, TX 34 17 16     67 82%
Seattle, WA 100         100 93%
TOTALS 708 280 98     1086  
% RUSA
finishers
81% 90% 99% % %   85%

Note A: This percentage is calculated on ACP-sanctioned brevets only. Populaires and 1200km randonnees attract a significant percentage of non-member and foreign participants. Including these types of events would skew the results for those regions that offer them.

The "RUSA finishers %" is calculated for each brevet length and each region. It is no surprise that the longer brevets attract the more dedicated riders who are more likely to be RUSA members. What is unexpected was the wide variation in RUSA participation among the regions. While there is a correlation between this figure and the number and types of brevets offered in each region, there are still wide variations among regions offering the same set of brevets.

total participants 932
participants who are RUSA members 660
% of participants who are RUSA members 71%

At first, the "% of participants who are RUSA members" figure seems improbably low because it is well below most of the "% RUSA finishers" figures from the table above. However, they are not directly comparable figures. The first table calculates brevets done by RUSA members as a fraction of total brevets, whereas the second table calculates RUSA member participants as a fraction of total participants. To see how there can be such a wide discrepancy, consider the following example. Suppose there are two brevets and 100 riders finish each one. At each event, there were 80 finishers who were RUSA members and 20 finishers who were non-members. In the first table, we would show that 80% of the finishers were RUSA members. But the second table will depend on who came to the brevets. If the same RUSA members finished both brevets but the 20 non-members who finished the first brevet were not the same 20 non-members who finished the second, the "% RUSA participants" figure would be 80/120=67%. Even though non-members may account for a small percentage of brevet completions, they represent a significant percentage of our total "head count." We typically see these non-members just once at a 200km or populaire. One could view this population as a reservoir of potential members. However, it is not clear from this analysis alone whether RUSA has been successful in converting these non-members to members.

total number of RUSA members 1909
participants who are RUSA members 660
% of RUSA members doing one or more brevets 35%

There is a significant fraction of RUSA members who do not do brevets. Have these members lost interest in RUSA?


USA Historical Trend

Year ACP Events RM Events RUSA Events Partici-
pants
Points
BrevetsFlèchesPBP (M)PBP (F) 1200+km PopulairesBrevetsArrowsDartsPerm'ts ACPRUSA
1999 3438 69 262 42     0       964 15558 10186
2000 1430 75     104   0       760 4530 6078
2001 2023 90     122   0       957 6406 8250
2002 2745 71     93 27 0       1242 8618 10035
2003 4697 81 344 56   153 62       1610 20019 15481
2004 2721 142     99 363 37     90 1437 8136 10346
2005 3338 142     209 387 253     282 1673 10280 14270
2006 3901 153     186 670 860   33 775 2258 12216 17858
2007 6845 216 385 44   743 874   17 1705 2684 22490 26296
2008 (ytd) 1086         255 126   23 296 932 2648 3201
Other than PBP, this table includes only those events run by USA clubs.
It does not include events done by USA participants in other countries.

The 1999 ACP points figure includes brevets run under both the RUSA and the International Randonneurs organizations. RUSA does not have any of the data from International Randonneurs in its database.


World Rankings -- Clubs

ACP points accumulated by each organizing club in the world are listed in the annual plaquette. The top 10 clubs organizing brevets in 2007 were:
Rank in 2007ClubACP Points
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 (ytd)
1Audax Australia - Victoria (AUS)              1131 3949  
2A.R.A. Nordbayern (DEU)  188 342 617 925 0 925 1344 2513  
3Audax Club Parisien (FRA)                2466  
4Randonnerus Cyclos de l'Anjou (FRA)                2153  
5AS Cheminots Rennais (FRA)                2149  
6Cyclo Club de Mours (FRA)                2048  
7Seattle International Randonneurs (USA)563 251 404 845 1921 967 1164 1536 2022 200
8Audax United Kingdom (GBR)0 124 906 638 5372       1928  
9A.R.D. Sjaelland (DEN)1762 589 398 503 553 0 0 623 1872  
10Club Cyclotouriste du Poner (FRA)                1743  


World Rankings -- Nations

ACP points are accumulated for each of the world's nations and these are also ranked. The 2007 standings were:
Rank in 2007NationACP Points
1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 (ytd)
1France69371 3817 3374 5355 58301 4239 3953 5029 54970  
2USA15558 4530 6406 8618 20019 8136 10280 12216 22490 2648
3England15880 4621 3284 3895 15384 3348 2305 2591 13070  
4Italy3856 1642 785 2080 7645 1814 1365 2701 9119  
5Germany3265 954 924 1418 6294 1614 2075 2517 8293  
6Australia4772 2241 2460 2794 3661 2448 3278 3329 6457  
7Japan0 0 0 827 1354 1475 3037 4759 5988  
8Spain13138 301 453 342 6056 527 3087 1750 5387  
9Canada3608 1718 1887 2404 4406 3053 3368 3140 4429  
10Denmark4358 688 644 767 5628 555 827 1064 3941  
11Brazil0 0 0 0 159 990 0 468 2527  
12Sweden1938 359 671 593 1743 489 585 676 2290  
13Russia813 307 359 598 1062 462 1146 1988 2250  
14Belgium2920 1040 1232 1529 3774 2078 2810 829 1956  
15Holland2406 311 375 597 2201 287 331 539 1795  
16S. Africa585 418 326 356 773 132 892 1020 1001  
17Greece0 0 0 0 739 536 627 718 964  
18Switzerland60 0 78 156 454 117 75 111 776  
19Austria579 131 110 87 454 6 128 124 765  
20Bulgaria279 221 351 255 467 310 296 441 594  
21Norway1084 317 396 310 807 236 185 213 467  
22Ireland48 0 21 79 97 26 80 26 230  
23Finland216 24 0 5 209 53 45 42 230  
24New Zealand0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190  
25Israel0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 148  
26Taiwan0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102  
27Slovenia0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92  
28Singapore0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51  
29Ukraine110 27 0 0 110 87 45 30 36  
30Hungary0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23  
31China0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16  
1ACP sometimes reports points for the Catalan and Vasco regions of Spain separately. This is a combined total.

In non-PBP years, the USA typically leads all nations in ACP points. In PBP years, France dominates the competition. For example, in 1999, France had 69371 points versus 15558 in the USA. Points resulting from PBP completions make a huge difference: 20034 for France vs. 3900 for the USA in 1999.

In 2003, ACP reported national rankings for BRM brevet points (200km-1000km) just as it does in non-PBP years. However, it also published the "Challenge ACP" which ranked nations and clubs for 200km through 600km brevets and PBP finishes (inexplicably, this ranking omits points for 1000km brevets). The table above uses the "Challenge ACP" rankings and totals for 2003; for all other years, the totals include points for 1000km brevets. In 2007, ACP reported national rankings but excluded points for PBP finishes. This makes the 2007 points total incomparable with the 1999 and 2003 totals (which included PBP points).


An interesting statistic is the number of ACP points accumulated relative to the nation's population, a crude measure of the popularity of randonneur cycling in that country. The following table is based on the points from 2007 and the population estimate of 2000.
Rank in 2007NationACP PointsPopulation
(millions)
ACP Points
per million people
1France54970 59.1 930
2Denmark3941 5.3 744
3Australia6457 18.9 342
4Sweden2290 8.9 257
5England13070 58.8 222
6Belgium1956 10.2 192
7Italy9119 57.3 159
8Canada4429 30.2 147
9Spain15387 39.6 136
10Holland1795 15.8 114
11Switzerland776 7.4 105
12Norway467 4.5 104
13Germany8293 82.2 101
14Austria765 8.2 93
15Greece964 10.6 91
16USA22490 273.8 82
17Bulgaria594 8.2 72
18Ireland230 3.7 62
19New Zealand190 3.9 49
20Japan5988 126.7 47
21Slovenia92 2 46
22Finland230 5.2 44
23S. Africa1001 40.4 25
24Israel148 6.2 24
25Brazil2527 170.1 15
26Russia2250 146.9 15
27Singapore51 3.6 14
28Taiwan102 22.2 5
29Hungary23 10 2
30Ukraine36 50.5 1
34China16 1277.6 0